Care in rural hospitals is just as good as that in urban hospitals, study concludes
Health News

Care in rural hospitals is just as good as that in urban hospitals, study concludes


While rural Americans have less access to primary care and have worse health outcomes, the care at rural hospitals is equal to, if not better, than that at urban hospitals, a National Rural Health Association report says.

The study also found rural health care is not more expensive than urban care. "However, urban residents rarely out-migrate to rural settings for either routine or advanced treatments or care yet many rural patients are referred to or voluntarily travel to urban providers based on the myth of better care," a summary of the study says.

The study was compiled by iVantage Health Analysis, a private health-care research company. It collected data on Medicare costs and health outcomes for doctors and hospitals for 12 months and divided the results into rural and urban groups based on zip codes, to give a picture of the state-by-state importance of rural hospitals.

In Kentucky, nearly half of its Medicare beneficiaries lived in rural counties in 2010. Nationwide, just 21 percent of them do, though there were western states with much higher percentages. In Wyoming, for example, 69 percent of Medicare beneficiaries live in rural places. Spending per Medicare beneficiary in Kentucky was nearly $8,000 in both urban ($7,851) and rural ($7,879) settings in 2010. That spending is high compared to the rest of the country, however; only nine other states had higher spending.
The study could have wider wider ramifications given changes in the federal health-care reform law and the move toward accountable care organizations, in which doctors and other providers are encouraged to team up to give coordinated care for a population of people and be paid financial incentives to do so.

"Value in health care is created by doing a few things well and not by trying to do everything," the summary reads. "The rural findings may just suggest that by national selection, rural has figured out what it does well and has optimized those services for the patient's benefit." (Read more)




- Rural Cancer Survivors Are Less Healthy Than Urban Counterparts; 25 Percent Of Rural Cancer Survivors Smoke
A quarter of rural cancer survivors smoke.Cancer survivors from rural areas live less healthier lives than survivors from urban areas. That's the diagnosis of a study by the Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C., which asked a...

- Health Reform Expected To Hurt Recruitment Of Rural Doctors
Recruiting doctors to rural hospitals will get harder in the next few years as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act reaches full implementation and the demand for healthcare services increases, a new report suggests. An Association...

- Tenn. Study Suggests Rural Residents Have As Much Access To Care As Anyone, If They're Insured And Don't Mind The Drive
A health-care study in Tennessee, which started with the premise that people in rural areas have less access to care than urban dwellers, ended with a rather surprising conclusion: They don't. Not if they have health insurance. "When it comes to commercially...

- Rural Health Care Is A Notch Below Care In Urban Areas, But Its Costs Are Lower And Its Emergency Rooms Are Faster, Study Finds
A national study has found a narrow gap between the quality of health care in rural and urban settings, but it does recognize the "significant differences" differences between urban and rural care. The report is an update to "Rural Relevance Under Healthcare...

- Rural Folks Have More Chronic Conditions And Less Access To Health Care, And Kentucky Is One Of The More Rural States
Though rural Americans have more chronic health conditions than those who live in urban centers, they have poorer access to health care, a working paper released last month confirms. Health experts are pointing to technology, including telemedicine, to...



Health News








.